Tags: Keywords: data mining, information civilization, infoglut, future of law and economics, lawfare and warfare, surveillance capitalism, platform power
Downloads: 2
View: 407
I address many themes constituting difficult terrains and am fully aware of problems of stricttime limits and temptation to evils of obfuscation and bouts of ostentatious learning that besetscholarly addresses.
As Cass Sunstein has recently observed: “the field of law and economics has revolutionized legal thinking. It may well be counted as the most influential intellectual development in law in the last one hundred years. It has also had a major impact on how regulators in the United States, Europe, and elsewhere deal with anti-trust, environmental protection, highway safety, health care, nuclear power, and workers’ rights.”2 But as Kaushik Basu adds: “It is easy to go on and draw attention to the power of law and economics in many other areas, from shaping regulation relating to finance and banking, to fiscal policy and laws to regulate the fiscal deficit. It is clearly a subject that deserves attention”.
Prof. (Dr.) Upendra Baxi (2025) "Informations Uncivilization: The Imperative for a New Approach to Law and Economics ", GNLU Journal of Law And Economics : Volume VII 2024, Issue I
Available at:
https://gnlu.ac.in/GJLE/Publications/Informations Uncivilization: The Imperative for a New Approach to Law and Economics
The essay examines the violence that unfurled in Bangladesh in 2024 from the lens of the relativedeprivation theory to explain the role of perceived inequality in political violence, and the prospecttheory to explain the role of prospect losses as a motivation for individuals to participate inpolitical violence. The essay analyses the events that acted as a trigger for the social unrest andfocuses on the contentious quota to explain the decisionmaking process of the players involved,from the viewpoint of the prospect theory. The essay also looks at macroeconomic variables suchas youth unemployment, inflation etc. during both the years that marked a social unrest among thegeneral population and found that in both years, the economy had shown worrying trends. Theessay also looks at the role of costs and benefits as perceived by an individual while making achoice in a risky situation. The conceptual framework is further demonstrated by a game wherethe decisionmaking process of the government, as a player, is discussed. It is found that theequilibrium for both the players is at the first outcome, where the participation is met withsuppression by the government. The most ideal outcome for both the parties is a peaceful approachto the issue at hand. Based on the existing research, and the game theory, policy recommendationshave been formulated emphasizing the need for a stronger penal system, to augment the costs thatare associated with participation in violence, and to make infrastructural developments to addressthe socioeconomic issues at hand. The establishment of transparent communication channelswould also go a long way in mitigating the risks of future unrest.